Comments for Vitriol for Valentine’s at http://www.faithandreason.com.au , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments http://www.faithandreason.com.au Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:50:41 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.faithandreason.com.au/index.php/all-articles/122-vitriol-for-valentines#comment-12 Jan To begin with, I didn't think people actually read any of these ramblings and so was surprised to find any sort of comment. You misunderstand the article. I suggest you read G.K. Chesterton or watch the BBC's production of 'The Taming of the Shrew' in the 'ShakespeaRe-Told' series. Or wait for Part Two. Arrivederci DV - Pietro Aretino Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:10:52 +0100 http://www.faithandreason.com.au/index.php/all-articles/122-vitriol-for-valentines#comment-11 Interesting article 'Pietro A.' I find it curious though, that you claim that the man has to be the "oath-maker" in a relationship. Are you suggesting that the woman doesn't need to make an oath/promise of love? If so, I don't think that's right, or what real love requires. It's about both the man and the woman. I don't agree with your statement that a man must forfeit all his "hopes, dreams and desires, all that he may honour his lady". Why should this be the case? No-one should have to give up their hopes and dreams just to be with someone. Surely the person they love would share their hopes and dreams for life, or at least respect them? - Jan Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:10:21 +0100